Ramesh Ponnuru: How not to argue with Bill Barr
31 Dec 2019 — #FakeNews
I’m open to criticisms of Attorney General Bill Barr, and have highlighted one or two in this space. But Katherine Stewart and Caroline Fredrickson have written an attack on him for the New York Times that seems to me a model of how not to engage in political debate. The op-ed is not persuasive, and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.
Media attacks on Barr will only increase: 'Bill Barr Thinks America Is Going to Hell' - NYT https://t.co/cMgbURSgTN— Deep Clips (@DeepClips) December 31, 2019
Joe DiGinova raises hell defending Bill Barr, who is accused of being a liar by the fake news media. He shuts her down and her response? “I think we are done here.” 🤣— #InfidelAims ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@2AForAReason) December 29, 2019
H/T @intheMatrixxx pic.twitter.com/JZZBPJ2qK5
This is why #DemocRATS & #FakeNews media alike are TERRIFIED of #AG #WilliamBarr & #JohnDurham! They don’t want them looking into any of this because it will expose the #DemocRAT party’s corruption. That’s why so many so-called “journalists” are trying to smear #Barr and #Durham pic.twitter.com/Izzwxq1DFV— 𝕶𝖓𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙𝖘 𝖔𝖋 𝕮𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖙🇬🇪 (@Templar_Nation) December 28, 2019