Fox’s Brooke Singeman, who has been perspicacious in her coverage of the probe of the Russia probe, has a disturbing “exclusive” Thursday with the headline: “Durham, under pressure to wrap up investigation, could ‘punt’ to after Election Day: source”
H/T: The Epoch Times
Wouldn’t we love to know who her “source” or “sources” were? But never mind for the moment. The story begins:
“U.S. Attorney John Durham is under pressure to wrap up his investigation into the origins of the Russia probe by the end of the summer, but if he doesn’t, he could wait to reveal his findings or initiate prosecutions until after the 2020 presidential election, Fox News has learned.
Durham, under pressure to wrap up investigation, could 'punt' to after Election Day: sourcehttps://t.co/PiN8lNdIxx— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) July 9, 2020
The Epoch Times article offers a good counter to the argument that releasing the findings of Durham's investigations before the election would be 'viewed political.'
Durham does not want his report “to be viewed political”? He must be dreaming. Nothing could be more political. It’s inextricably so, no matter what he says or does or when he does it.
To wit, what Mr. Durham is said to be investigating is whether one or more of our most important law enforcement and intelligence agencies (DOJ, FBI, CIA, State Department and so forth) were highjacked and used illegally to prevent Donald Trump from being elected president and/or for undercutting his presidency and administration after he was.
What in the Sam Hill could be more political than that?
For the life of me, I don't know what is taking Durham so long. He had enough on these guys a year ago to put them all away.— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) July 9, 2020
Mueller appointed May 2017:— Undercover Huber (@JohnWHuber) July 9, 2020
—1 month: over 30 prosecutors & fed agents on the team
—2 months: issued 25+ search warrants via a DC grand jury including even for all of Michael Cohen’s emails
—5 months: Mueller brought his first indictments
Durham’s been on the job A YEAR PLUS
New Steele evidence strengthens Durham prosecution as frustration over inaction grows https://t.co/vZfwfiUnkN— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) July 10, 2020
Rep. Doug Collins went on Mornings with Maria to call for Durham report to be released before election. Watch below.
Folks, Grassley knows what Durham has - this guy has inside info on everything...and he's now calling for indictments immediately...So they've got the goods on some heavy-hitters. 🍿🙌🏿https://t.co/tkouona8GJ— ✭ Wayne Dupree ✭ (@WayneDupreeShow) July 9, 2020
Where the Hell Is John Durham?— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 10, 2020
My column today—Trump is justifiably enraged that nothing has yet come of this investigation. Durham was appointed 14 months ago. By this point, Mueller was charging, arresting, and sending Trump associates to jail. https://t.co/g8sltxYqSb
#FISA British court orders ex-spy Christopher Steele’s firm to pay limited damages to 2 Russian bankers for “inaccurate” or “misleading” material in dossier. Why it matters: Use of dossier central to ongoing Durham investigation @CBSNews READ Court docs: https://t.co/sEAG6lzU9f pic.twitter.com/Vjpogkmioz— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) July 9, 2020
1. John Durham (CT)— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) July 9, 2020
2. John Bash (West TX)
3. Jeff Jenson (STL - MO)
4. Scott Brady (Pittsburgh - PA)
5. ?? https://t.co/MVZngOF87C